![]() | ||||||||||
UPDATE: See the new "Personal information" link on each candidate's page. |
The Reverend Linda L. Grenz Having read our
profile, why are you interested in being the Bishop of Maine, and what gifts
would you bring to this ministry? I am drawn by who you are, what you seek and how well my
life and ministry experience fits with that. My ministry has been focused on
education and ministry development with particular attention to small churches.
Having spent my life teaching, in one form or another, (often under the role of
consultant), I would be a teaching bishop. I bring information, skills and
knowledge of resources about many aspects of congregational and diocesan life.
My style is to engage people in a learning community I share what I have to
contribute but I also assume that each person around the table also has
something of value to share. My role is to engage everyone in sharing their
knowledge and gifts and helping the group integrate individual contributions in
a way that allows all of us to create something that is greater than the sum of
the parts. I bring the gift of helping people build learning communities in which people
are transformed by Christ. A key part of that is fostering ministry development
by individuals and congregations. As a parish priest, I focused on helping
members of congregations identify their ministry, provided the training and
support they needed to do those ministries and affirmed them in it. As a
national church staff person and in my role at LeaderResources, I have been
involved in developing education and training programs and resources, training
mentors to lead various programs and assisting bishops, Commissions on Ministry
and diocesan staff in assessing, developing or enhancing their local ministry
development programs. My current work is on using organizational system theory and spiritual
practices as a way of guiding the spiritual formation of the congregation as a
whole. We usually talk about spiritual formation on the individual level, but I
believe that congregations also need to and can be engaged in a process of
spiritual formation. Focusing on spiritual formation can be a way for
congregations to work through some of the theological differences that face us
today. Instead of engaging in a political process of debate and decision, a
spiritual formation process engages members of a congregation in one common
spiritual practice (hospitality, healing, prayer, etc.) and reflection on that
discipline in a way that helps the entire congregation move into a deeper
relationship with God and each other in Christ. In that process, individuals
often find that the system and their place in it has shifted and the previous
theological differences are now framed in a different way. While this is not a
magical fix for disagreements about various issues, it does provide a way for
congregations to engage change from a spiritual perspective instead of being
drawn into our cultural tendency to divide and debate issues with the assumption
that one side must be right and another wrong. I was raised on a farm in Describe the process you have used to
assist or lead a congregation through their struggle with a theological issue.
Was there a resulting epiphany in your own understanding? While this story is from the earliest days of my ministry, I chose it because
of its applicability to todays issues about the ministry of homosexual persons.
I was ordained in 1977 and that fall became one of the first women rectors in
the Episcopal Church. I served a church that offered a part-time job and,
frankly, that couldnt get anyone else to take the job! They were a wonderful
congregation who approached any idea with the motto of: Lets try it, if it
doesnt work, well try something else (vs. the usual Weve always done it
this way.). So they were willing to give a woman priest a try. There were, however, a number of members who were less than happy with this
decision. Most of them took a wait and see attitude but, shortly after I
arrived, it was clear that one highly involved family could not live with a
woman as their rector. They were already unhappy about he changes in the liturgy
and this was the last straw. They announced their intention to leave. This
created a huge crisis: they were very active and gave generously in a church
that was short on people and money. Most of the congregation was older and this
family was younger exactly the kind of people the congregation wanted. So,
some members immediately tried to persuade the couple to stay while others began
to question the vestrys wisdom in hiring me. I met with the family and together we realized that they were so
uncomfortable with the new liturgy and so opposed to the idea of women priests
that they could not worship with us anymore. I gathered the congregations
leaders and explained that our job was not to retain members of this particular
church. Our job was to help every member of the church worship God with all
their heart, mind and soul. If this couple could not do so in our congregation,
our job was to help them find a place where they could and do that in a way
that made it clear that there was nothing wrong with them for feeling as they
did and that they would always be part of us and could always come back if they
chose to do so. I then worked with the family to help them identify a
congregation nearby that was more compatible for them, I went with them to
introduce them to that priest and they tried it out a few Sundays before
deciding to join that church. I invited them back on a Sunday and we said
farewell: the congregation expressed their appreciation for the gifts and
ministry they had brought to them and the family expressed their appreciation
for their support and for the way we had handled their leaving. We blessed them
and sent them off with sadness and love. They returned to visit most years on
Mothering Sunday and about five years later they came back as members. I learned several things from that experience. One is that we need to focus
on the spiritual needs ahead of the need to convince others we are right. I,
obviously, believed that the ordination of women was the right thing for the
church to do. But I made it clear that while I believed it was the right thing
to do, I also knew that I (and the church) could be wrong. I said that I was not
worried about that I knew that God would take care of that. I believe that in
taking the long view so I explained that we, as the church, would be able to
discern whether we were right or wrong only over time. If we were right, the
ministry of ordained women would flourish and grow; if we were wrong, the
ministry of women would wither and die away. So my job, as an ordained woman,
was simply to be the best priest I could be. God would either bless that
ministry or not. Meanwhile, I didnt need to worry about or spend my time
arguing with others about whether it was right or wrong for me to be a priest. Once I had made it clear that I was not going to debate the rightness or
wrongness of the churchs decision but rather was going to merely live into it
and wait on the Lord, everyone relaxed and decided they too could wait and see
what happened. This one family was not comfortable living with it on a daily
basis, so we all agreed that the most loving thing was for us to help them find
a church home where they could wholeheartedly worship God. That stance
ultimately allowed them to return and the father said to me: The fact that you
didnt argue with me or make me feel like I was wrong is what allowed me to work
through this and see that God was, in fact, blessing your ministry. I also learned that way we do things matters as much as what we do. The fact
that we put this into a spiritual context and handled it liturgically meant that
people felt much better about what was happening than if the family had just
left. The effort we all made to ensure that they did not feel that we were
judging them negatively, allowed them to soften their stance and leave
graciously. What legacy would you like to leave when
you retire as Bishop from the Diocese of Maine? I would like to see us become an inviting church. Our current motto is:
The Episcopal Church welcomes you. That says: If you are looking for a church
and happen to visit us, we will welcome you. And we often do a fairly good job
of that. But it is a totally passive stance towards the world a stance that
works best in an era when most people went to church and it was merely a matter
of choosing one to join. Today many people, even in small towns and rural areas,
do not attend a church. And welcoming them is not enough. We have to become an
inviting churcha people who practice inviting family, friends and strangers to
church and a church that is inviting that is, a place that the people find
attracts them, drawing them in, much like a warm fire on a cold winter day draws
one in. I believe that we can find ways to invite others, including young adults
and families with children and youth. It will require creativity, ingenuity and
the faithful practice of taking the church to people instead of waiting for them
to come to us. Jesus did not sit in I would like us develop models for being a sustainable church. I would like
to see the diocese develop several ways to meet the challenge of big
buildings/little money. I believe that we can use the same principles of
development that we taught others overseas to figure out ways to use our
buildings and people in ways that generate income and contribute to the
well-being of our local communities. I would like to have built partnerships
with the government, municipalities and other community groups to start small
businesses, schools, health care programs etc. in our churches. Id like to see
some of our church kitchens used during the week by a host of small
entrepreneurs who are earning a living making blueberry jams, fudge and other Finally, Id like to have left a legacy of learning communities where people
who are members of or enter those congregations encounter and are transformed by
Christ. Learning communities are not just about studying they are communities
of people who constantly and consciously practicing, reflecting on and learning
from their experience and apply what they learn to improve their future. So, a
congregation that is a learning community is constantly seeking to learn how to
best live the Christian life, how to make Christ real in their lives and how to
share Gods love with others. As a part of that, I would like to have
participated in strengthening a tradition of learning amongst the clergy and in
parish visitations. Id like to do teaching missions and/or to have visitations
as a time of shared learning. Id like to establish adult education as normative
for adults alongside of the formation we now do with children and youth so all
of us in the Christian community might grow in faith and in the love of God. |
|||||||||